We don’t need another tax and that is just what this carbon scam is going to be. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Why didn’t Mike Duffy just go get a loan at Money Mart? It would have saved everybody a lot of trouble. The jury is still out on whether his journey up Parliament Hill will be judged more slippery than the trip down. The country is about to get that deserving insight not from Duff, the informed inside-Ottawa reporter, but from a perturbed, often petulant (and possibly convicted) Canadian senator. Guilty or not of the charges against him, and whether he’s proven a political pawn or a public-purse predator, Mike Duffy is about to give the country a shocking glimpse behind the velvet curtain that separates the hidden workings of high office from those who unknowingly fund its arcane employment practices.
FOOTWEAR FASHION FAUX PAS CROSSWORD TRIAL
Re: The Trial During Which All Becomes Clear, Andrew Coyne, April 7. Please try again Article content Duffian insights The next issue of NP Platformed will soon be in your inbox. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. Smadar Meiri, Thornhill, Ont.Ī welcome email is on its way. No doubt, fashionable styles pass but memorable feelings do not. Perhaps she perceived shin-high boots worn with my printed Paisley woolen skirt, bought four to five years previously at Saks Fifth Avenue on sale, as attributing me to being a JAP - Jewish American Princess - which was further from the truth. Atwood views my attire and coldly, abruptly signs the book as if she’s doing me a favour - no smile or thank you. Atwood’s confession at the Victoria & Albert Museum “that she judged women on what they wore” explains my feeling of being offended back in 1981 upon signing her book, Bodily Harm, (ironically, a book intertwined with a fashion theme) when I was a University of Toronto student. Atwood’s comments remind me of art history professors’ lectures making observational comparisons of motifs which were stretched just to make a point. There are no stark differences in the impeccable dress styles between the late Princess Diana and the Duchess of Cambridge. Margaret Atwood’s criticism of the Duchess of Cambridge’s unfashionable style is unwarranted. Activate your Online Access Now Article content If you are a Home delivery print subscriber, unlimited online access is included in your subscription. Manage Print Subscription / Tax Receipt.It’s safe to say M&S has your wardrobe covered this season.
The retailer first partnered with the rental service more than a year ago, but has chosen to elevate its selection on the platform to offer five, six or seven-piece womenswear capsules for eco-conscious shoppers.įrom “city knits” to “transitional trends”, each capsule is available to rent for either four, 14 or 30 days, from £39 – meaning you can enjoy a month’s worth of clothes and classic pieces for a fraction of the cost.Īs well as its capsule offering, there’s also co-ords and two-piece bundles spanning everyday staples and evening-wear options. And now, stalwart Marks and Spencer has expanded its own range of rental wear by launching capsule collections on Hirestreet. Cult names in the renting industry such as Hurr, Hirestreet and By Rotation have built a loyal and lucrative following, while more and more high-street brands are offering up rented clothes through third parties to meet growing demand – from John Lewis & Partners and French Connection to Nobody’s Child and Asos.
0 kommentar(er)
